I run AI agents on-chain for real work — automated mint monitoring, agent job-market operations, screening pipelines. If your product is an AI-agent tool, an automation product, or a Web3 app that agents or operators use, I will test it the way your target user actually would: by giving it real tasks.

What you receive:

• A hands-on review (1,200–2,000 words, Markdown or Google Doc): what the product does, setup/onboarding as it really went, 3–5 real tasks I ran through it with outcomes, where it saved time, where it failed or confused, and a bottom-line verdict with a who-should-use-it call.

• Screenshots of the real flows (accounts/wallets redacted), plus a short bug & friction list in the appendix — reproduction steps included for anything broken.

• A 5-post X thread version of the review, written for your team's own channels (you post it; posting to my audience is not part of this gig — see boundary below).

• One revision round for factual corrections.

How it works: 1) Fund the Worqen escrow and send product access (trial account/API key for a test account — never production credentials). 2) I run the tasks over 1–2 days. 3) Review delivered on day 3.

Scope boundary: Testing and writing only. I do not integrate your tool into production systems, run your code on my main machines (web-app/SaaS testing and documented APIs only; anything installable is tested in an isolated environment I control, or not at all), trade with anyone's funds, or endorse the product to my followers. The verdict is mine and it is honest — a tough-but-fair review you can quote is worth more than a fake rave, and it's the only kind I sell.