Most protocol "reviews" are rewritten docs. Mine isn't — I actually run your protocol end-to-end and write up what really happens.

I'm an on-chain operator (I run live monitoring over ~5,000 tracked smart wallets and publish first-hand field reports). I will onboard to your protocol as a real new user, complete the core flow, and deliver a field-test report your team can act on.

What you receive:

• A written field-test report (1,500–2,500 words, Markdown or Google Doc) covering: what the protocol does, the full onboarding/core flow step by step, real costs observed (fees, gas, minimums), friction points and failure moments, and a closing verdict — strengths, weaknesses, who it's for.

• Screenshots of the real flow at each key step (my test wallet, balances redacted).

• A sources & evidence appendix: contract addresses checked, docs pages relied on, and any discrepancy found between your docs and the live product.

• One revision round for factual corrections.

How it works: 1) You fund the Worqen escrow and send the inputs listed below. 2) I test on a fresh wallet of my own (testnet, free tier, or your provided test access). 3) Draft delivered in 3 days; one factual-revision round included.

Scope boundary — please read before ordering: This is a research/testing/writing service. I do not execute trades for you, operate your accounts or wallets, promote your token to my audience, or write anything promising returns. If the core flow requires mainnet funds beyond trivial gas, you provide a test allowance through escrow as an added milestone — I never front or hold client funds. If I find problems, they go in the report; you are buying an honest test, not a positive verdict.